Final Report
for 2005-2006 from the
Academic
Computing & Telecommunications Committee
The Academic Computing & Telecommunications Committee (ACTC) for the 2005-2006 year included sixteen members representing students, faculty and staff. The membership list is attached as Exhibit I. The charges to the Committee are attached as Exhibit II.
In order to address this diverse set of charges, ACTC instituted several subcommittees, a Research Computing Subcommittee, a Library Subcommittee, and a Connectivity/Security/Services Subcommittee. The subcommittee membership, charges, and activities are listed below.
Research Computing Subcommittee:
Chair: Joe EvansMembers: Donna Liss, Ward Thompson, Satya Mandal, John Stobaugh
Subcommittee charges:
3. Interact with other governance committees as
needed, including
b. Research
Committee on the needs of faculty/staff members conducting research
6. Brief the Faculty Council at its 11/10/05
meeting on the university-wide plan for a research computing infrastructure and
how best to develop sustainable policies and procedures to support campus
needs. Make policy recommendations
related to the development of an institutional research computing
infrastructure.
Activities:
1.
This subcommittee and individual members met with
the Faculty Senate Research Committee (FSRC), and in particular the FSRC
Subcommittee on Research Computing, several times. Items of mutual concern as well as ongoing
efforts to implement a university-wide cyberinfrastructure plan were
discussed. A briefing prepared for the
meeting with FSRC RCS on 16 March 2006 is attached as Exhibit IV. ACTC and FSRC RCS agree in principle that
Governance needs to become more formally involved in the oversight of research
cyberinfrastructure, and joint recommendations should be formulated.
2. The activities of
ACTC in regards to research cyberinfrastructure (as well as the other
activities of ACTC) were presented to the University Senate Executive Committee
at its 13 March 2006 meeting. This
presentation is attached as Exhibit III.
The cyberinfrastructure plan outlined in this presentation was briefed to the Provost’s Office on 27
March 2006 and was received favorably.
Governance support for this plan would further enhance this initiative.
Library Subcommittee:
Chair: Holly MercerMembers: Eva Horn, Bill Comer, Merhdad Hosni, Riley Dutton
Subcommittee charges:
2. Provide advice and direction to units
providing resources on how advancements in computing and telecommunication can
improve learning at KU, including:
c. KU Libraries on learning
environment, such as the development of collaborative learning space in which
students, faculty and staff members can work in teams.
3. Interact with other governance committees
as needed, including
a. Library Committee on
advancements in information technology, and
Activities:
1. This subcommittee met and discussed the
computing and telecommunications issues relating to the KU Libraries. No urgent recommendations were forthcoming.
Connectivity/Security/Services Subcommittee:
Chair: Brian HanaburyMembers: Liz Johnson, Albert Sheu, Thelma Simons, James Waegelein, Arthur Jones
Subcommittee charges:
1. Gather information about current
developments, needs and concerns in computing and telecommunications through a
collaborative effort among faculty, student and staff members. Recommend
changes to Senex and provide feedback to appropriate groups in areas such as:
a. Connectivity, such as wireless
networking and the use of online and storage systems.
b. Security, such as password
protection and thefts of identity and intellectual property.
2. Provide advice and direction to units
providing resources on how advancements in computing and telecommunication can
improve learning at KU, including:
a. Center for Teaching Excellence
on the uses of technology in teaching, including methods for improving
instruction in classrooms and online.
b. Instructional Development and
Support (IDS) on courseware (Blackboard), mediated classrooms, and faculty
training needs.
d. Academic Computing Services
(ACS) on training needs of students, faculty and staff.
e. Continuing Education on
distance learning programs.
5. Discuss with the Academic Achievement and
Activities:
1.
This subcommittee met and discussed mechanisms for
effectively gathering information on needs and developments. The subcommittee recommends development of a
targeted survey in order to gather information from focused audiences in order
to yield a manageable amount of data.
Some of the proposed content for this survey appears in the presentation
in Exhibit III. This survey would be
performed in the next academic year.
2.
The issue of the impact of technology improvements
on the mission of the Academic Achievement and Access Center was discussed and
the Committee was supportive of the notion of creating a Assistive Technology
Coordinator position.
In addition to the subcommittee activities,
ACTC met as a whole several times. In a
meeting of particular note, Denise Stephens, the Vice Provost for Information
Services, briefed Committee on the status and plans for KU Information
Services. Among other plans, Information
Services anticipates issuing annual reports, which will improve communication
with the University community.
Exhibit I.
Academic Computing &
Telecommunications Committee
2005-2006
Chair: Joe Evans, EECS, (2008)
Council Rep: Albert
Sheu, Math
Bill Comer, Slavic
Languages (2006)
John Stobaugh,
Pharm. Chem (2007)
Holly Mercer,
Libraries (2008)
Satya Mandal, Math,
(2008)
Eva Horn, Education
(2008)
Ward Thompson,
Chem. (2008)
Jim Waegelein,
Business (2008)
Arthur Jones, Vice
Chair, Student
Merhdad Hosni,
Student
Riley Dutton,
Student
Liz Johnson,
Student,
Thelma Simons,
Academic Computing, Unclassified Senate rep (2006)
Brian Hanabury,
Libraries, University Support Staff Rep (2008)
Ex-officio - Donna
Liss, Assoc. Vice-Provost, Informational Services
Note: Dates in
parentheses represent end of term of membership.
Exhibit II.
Charges
to the Academic Computing and Telecommunications Committee for FY06
Standing Charges
1. Gather information about current
developments, needs and concerns in computing and telecommunications through a
collaborative effort among faculty, student and staff members. Recommend
changes to Senex and provide feedback to appropriate groups in areas such as:
a. Connectivity, such as wireless networking and
the use of online and storage systems.
b. Security, such as password protection and
thefts of identity and intellectual property.
2. Provide advice and direction to units
providing resources on how advancements in computing and telecommunication can
improve learning at KU, including:
a. Center for Teaching Excellence on the uses of
technology in teaching, including methods for improving instruction in
classrooms and online.
b. Instructional Development and Support (IDS)
on courseware (Blackboard), mediated classrooms, and faculty training needs.
c. KU Libraries on learning environment, such as
the development of collaborative learning space in which students, faculty and
staff members can work in teams.
d. Academic Computing Services (ACS) on training
needs of students, faculty and staff.
e. Continuing Education on distance learning
programs.
3. Interact with other governance committees
as needed, including
a. Library Committee on advancements in
information technology, and
b. Research Committee on the needs of
faculty/staff members conducting research
4. Submit to SenEx:
a. Approved
minutes of each meeting.
b. Recommendations
for action as they are approved by the committee.
c. A
final report by April 1, 2006. For each of the above charges, the report should
describe the committee’s findings and recommendations, including suggestions
for the following year’s charges.
Additional Charge
5. Discuss with the Academic Achievement and
Access Center ways in which technology
improvements can assist students with disabilities. This may include creating
the position of Assistive Technology Coordinator to ensure that future
web/computer based technologies are fully accessible.
6. Brief the Faculty Council at its 11/10/05 meeting on the
university-wide plan for a research computing infrastructure and how best to
develop sustainable policies and procedures to support campus needs. Make policy recommendations related to the
development of an institutional research computing infrastructure.
Exhibit III.
Presentation to University Senate Executive Committee
Exhibit IV.
Presentation to
Faculty Senate Research Committee’s Subcommittee on Research Computing